Kirkendall v. Cook

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Kirkendall v. Cook

33 So. 3d 751, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4946, 2010 WL 1460209

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 2010·No. 4D08-4288·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rooney v. Lawrence E. Hannon, M.D., P.A., 732 So.2d 408, 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (indicating that “it is simply unfair to allow a party to hold back an objection like a trump card, ready to be played in the event of an unfavorable verdict”); Jenkins v. State, 732 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

GROSS, C.J., POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Rooney v. Lawrence E. Hannon, M.D., P.A., 732 So.2d 408, 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999) (indicating that “it is simply unfair to allow a party to hold back an objection like a trump card, ready to be played in the event of an unfavorable verdict”); Jenkins v. State, 732 So.2d 1185 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999).

GROSS, C.J., POLEN and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Kirkendall v. Cook, 33 So. 3d 751, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 4946, 2010 WL 1460209 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

Pincite

33 So. 3d 751 (Kirkendall v. Cook) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related