Kirk v. State

72 S.E. 282, 9 Ga. App. 829, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 359
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kirk v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 10 Ga. App. 450
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 10, 1911·No. 3600·Published

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

A new trial will not be granted because of alleged newly discovered testimony where one of the attorneys of record for the movant fails to submit an affidavit showing his ignorance of such testimony at the time of the trial, and no reason is given for such failure, and where the affidavit of the alleged newly discovered witness himself is not produced, nor his absence accounted for, and where the alleged newly discovered evidence is substantially cumulative in character, and would not tend to produce a different result on a second trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kirk v. State, 72 S.E. 282, 9 Ga. App. 829, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 359 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

72 S.E. 282 (Kirk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.