Kirk v. State

73 S.E. 623, 10 Ga. App. 450, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 556
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJanuary 30, 1912
Docket3867
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 S.E. 623 (Kirk v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kirk v. State, 73 S.E. 623, 10 Ga. App. 450, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 556 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).

Opinion

Hill, C. J.

The discretion of the court in refusing to grant a new trial on an extraordinary motion therefor, based on alleged newly discovered testimony, was properly exercised, where it appeared that the testimony alleged to be newly discovered was substantially the same as in the original motion for a new trial, made on the same ground, and was only cumulative and impeaching in character, and would probably not produce a different verdict on a second trial.

Judgment affirmed

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ware v. State
89 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 S.E. 623, 10 Ga. App. 450, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 556, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kirk-v-state-gactapp-1912.