Kirk v. State
73 S.E. 623, 10 Ga. App. 450, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 556
Opinion
The discretion of the court in refusing to grant a new trial on an extraordinary motion therefor, based on alleged newly discovered testimony, was properly exercised, where it appeared that the testimony alleged to be newly discovered was substantially the same as in the original motion for a new trial, made on the same ground, and was only cumulative and impeaching in character, and would probably not produce a different verdict on a second trial.
Judgment affirmed
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kirk v. State, 73 S.E. 623, 10 Ga. App. 450, 1912 Ga. App. LEXIS 556 (Ga. Ct. App. 1912).
73 S.E. 623 (Kirk v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ware v. State
89 S.E. 155 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1916)