Kirk v. Raymark

Opinion

Opinions of the United

1995 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

5-24-1995

Kirk v Raymark Precedential or Non-Precedential:

Docket 94-1745

Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995

Recommended Citation "Kirk v Raymark" (1995). 1995 Decisions. Paper 96. http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/thirdcircuit_1995/96

This decision is brought to you for free and open access by the Opinions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit at Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in 1995 Decisions by an authorized administrator of Villanova University School of Law Digital Repository. For more information, please contact Benjamin.Carlson@law.villanova.edu.

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

Nos. 94-1745 and 94-1746

SARAH A. KIRK, Administratrix of the Estates of KIRK, Alfred T., Deceased and KIRK, Sarah A. in her own right

v.

RAYMARK INDUSTRIES, INC.; EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.; KEENE CORPORATION; GARLOCK INC; OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLAS CORPORATION; CELOTEX CORP.; GAF CORPORATION;

OWENS-ILLINOIS GLASS COMPANY

Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corporation,

Appellant

BEFORE: STAPLETON, GREENBERG and COWEN, Circuit Judges

SUR PETITION FOR PANEL REHEARING

The petition for rehearing filed by appellee in the above-entitled case having been submitted to the judges who

participated in the decision of this court and all judges who

concurred in the decision having asked for rehearing, the

petition for panel rehearing is granted. The panel opinion is

hereby vacated.

By the Court,

/s/ Robert E. Cowen Circuit Judge

Dated: May 24, l995