Kipp v. Delamater
58 How. Pr. 183
Opinion
I do not see -how this motion can be granted.
1st. The authorities are against it (6 Abb. N. C., 69). 2d. The proceedings are in rem. against different pieces of property; and there is no reason why one parcel should bear burdens, in the way of costs, which belong to another. 3d. Eights of individual defendants differ, and one defendant should not bear that which belongs to another.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kipp v. Delamater, 58 How. Pr. 183 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).
58 How. Pr. 183 (Kipp v. Delamater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tobin v. Smith
1 Ohio N.P. 75 (Lucas County Court of Common Pleas, 1894)