Bech v. Ruggles

New York Supreme Court

Bech v. Ruggles

6 Abb. N. Cas. 69

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 15, 1878

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 Abb. N. Cas. 69 (Bech v. Ruggles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Bech v. Ruggles, 6 Abb. N. Cas. 69 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1878).

Pincite

Opinion

Lawrence, J.

The language of section 817 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not materially differ from article 4, of title 6, of chapter 6, of part 3, of the Revised Statutes (3 R. S. p. 666, § 38, 5th Ed.). Under the latter statutes it was held, per Davies, J., that [70]*70actions for the foreclosure of mortgages could not be consolidated (Grant v. Spencer, cited in Thomas on Mortgages, 269; 2 Wait's Practice, 555).

Motion denied with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lawrence, J.

The language of section 817 of the Code of Civil Procedure does not materially differ from article 4, of title 6, of chapter 6, of part 3, of the Revised Statutes (3 R. S. p. 666, § 38, 5th Ed.). Under the latter statutes it was held, per Davies, J., that [70]*70actions for the foreclosure of mortgages could not be consolidated (Grant v. Spencer, cited in Thomas on Mortgages, 269; 2 Wait's Practice, 555).

Motion denied with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

6 Abb. N. Cas. 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/bech-v-ruggles-nysupct-1878.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack