Kinsey Gordon William Lee Carr Kevin Daniel Ross Troy A. Mintle v. Steve Faber, Lt.

963 F.2d 187, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 8536, 1992 WL 83815
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedApril 29, 1992
Docket91-3731
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 963 F.2d 187 (Kinsey Gordon William Lee Carr Kevin Daniel Ross Troy A. Mintle v. Steve Faber, Lt.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kinsey Gordon William Lee Carr Kevin Daniel Ross Troy A. Mintle v. Steve Faber, Lt., 963 F.2d 187, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 8536, 1992 WL 83815 (8th Cir. 1992).

Opinion

McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

Lieutenant Steve Faber appeals from a final judgment entered in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, after a bench trial, finding him liable pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violating the rights of Kinsey Gordon, William Lee Carr, Kevin Daniel Ross, and Troy A. Mintle under the cruel and unusual punishments clause of the Eighth Amendment. Gordon v. Faber, No. C 90-0044, et al. (N.D.Iowa Nov. 5, 1991). Appellant is a security officer and appellees are inmates at the Iowa Men's Reformatory in Anamosa, Iowa. The district court assessed compensatory damages of $75.00 per appellee and ordered appellant to pay costs. Slip op. at 9. For reversal, appellant argues, among other things, that the district court clearly erred in finding that the deprivation suffered by appellees was sufficiently grave to meet the objective component of cruel and unusual punishment. We retain jurisdiction over this case and remand the case to the district court with directions. We direct the district court to clarify its findings as to whether the objective component of cruel and unusual punishment has been satisfied in light of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions in Hudson v. McMillian, — U.S. —, —, 112 S.Ct. 995, 999-1000, 117 L.Ed.2d 156 (1992) (to establish objective component of a conditions-of-confinement claim, deprivation must be “extreme” and must deny “minimal civilized measure of life’s necessities”), and Wilson v. Seiter, — U.S. —, —, 111 S.Ct. 2321, 2324, 115 L.Ed.2d 271 (1991) (same).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
963 F.2d 187, 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 8536, 1992 WL 83815, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinsey-gordon-william-lee-carr-kevin-daniel-ross-troy-a-mintle-v-steve-ca8-1992.