Kinney v. Weaver

Fifth Circuit

Kinney v. Weaver

338 F.3d 432, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20117, 2003 WL 21635028

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedJuly 9, 2003

DocketNo. 00-40557

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 338 F.3d 432 (Kinney v. Weaver) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kinney v. Weaver, 338 F.3d 432, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20117, 2003 WL 21635028 (5th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING AND PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 31, 2002, 5th Cir., 2002, 301 F.3d 253)

Before KING, Chief Judge, and JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI