Kingwood International Resort, LLC v. Richard Clark, Personally, and on Behalf of Rick's at Achasta

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedOctober 25, 2019
DocketA20I0052
StatusPublished

This text of Kingwood International Resort, LLC v. Richard Clark, Personally, and on Behalf of Rick's at Achasta (Kingwood International Resort, LLC v. Richard Clark, Personally, and on Behalf of Rick's at Achasta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kingwood International Resort, LLC v. Richard Clark, Personally, and on Behalf of Rick's at Achasta, (Ga. Ct. App. 2019).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ October 08, 2019

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A20I0052. KINGWOOD INTERNATIONAL RESORT, LLC et al. v. RICHARD CLARK, PERSONALLY, AND ON BEHALF OF RICK’S AT ACHASTA

Defendants Kingwood International Resort, LLC, and Kingwood Dahlonega International Resort, LLC, seek interlocutory review of the trial court’s order denying their motion for summary judgment. We lack jurisdiction because the certificate of immediate review was not entered within ten days of the trial court’s order. Pursuant to OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only if the trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review should be had. A timely certificate of immediate review is a jurisdictional requirement. See Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc., 133 Ga. App. 23, 24 (2) (209 SE2d 715) (1974). If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within that ten-day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until the final judgment to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Wilcher v. Confederate Packaging, Inc., 287 Ga. App. 451, 452 (1) (651 SE2d 790) (2007) (“A certificate of immediate review of a court order must be signed by the trial judge and filed with the clerk of the trial court within ten days of the entry of the interlocutory order sought to be appealed.”). Here, the trial court entered its order denying the defendants’ motion for summary judgment on August 27, 2019. Seventeen days later, on September 13, the court entered an order granting the defendants’ request for a certificate of immediate review. Although the trial court signed the certificate of immediate review on September 6, the relevant date for determining the timeliness of the certificate is the date it was filed with the clerk of the trial court. See Van Schallern v. Stanco, 130 Ga. App. 687, 687 (204 SE2d 317) (1974). Accordingly, the certificate was untimely and this application is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ 10/08/2019 I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Von Waldner v. Baldwin/Cheshire, Inc.
209 S.E.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)
Wilcher v. Confederate Packaging, Inc.
651 S.E.2d 790 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
Schallern v. Stanco
204 S.E.2d 317 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Kingwood International Resort, LLC v. Richard Clark, Personally, and on Behalf of Rick's at Achasta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kingwood-international-resort-llc-v-richard-clark-personally-and-on-gactapp-2019.