King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

King v. State

1921 OK CR 227, 201 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 203, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedNovember 23, 1921

DocketNo. A-4053.

StatusPublished

This text of 1921 OK CR 227 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 1921 OK CR 227, 201 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 203, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160 (Okla. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Tom Bang, was convicted on a charge of selling one quart of whisky to Ira Hamilton, .and was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this eoiirt on August 17, 1921, a petition in error with case-made. His counsel of record has moved the court to dismiss the appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and i«t is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Tom Bang, was convicted on a charge of selling one quart of whisky to Ira Hamilton, .and was sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 30 days and to pay a fine of $50. From the judgment he appealed by filing in this eoiirt on August 17, 1921, a petition in error with case-made. His counsel of record has moved the court to dismiss the appeal. The motion to dismiss is sustained, and i«t is ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1921 OK CR 227, 201 P. 1119, 20 Okla. Crim. 203, 1921 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 160, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-oklacrimapp-1921.