King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

King v. State

1920 OK CR 147, 191 P. 1118, 17 Okla. Crim. 734, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedAugust 14, 1920

DocketNo. A-3153.

StatusPublished

This text of 1920 OK CR 147 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 1920 OK CR 147, 191 P. 1118, 17 Okla. Crim. 734, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Plaintiff in error, Jack King, was convicted on a charge of selling one-half pint of whisky and two quarts of beer to one H.L. Griffin, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was on the 2nd day of June, 1917, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 90 days and to pay a fine of $100. From the judgment he appeals. No brief has been filed. The record shows that the testimony of the four witnesses for the state is undisputed. An examination of the record discloses that plaintiff in error had a fair and impartial trial, and that the appeal is without merit. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Plaintiff in error, Jack King, was convicted on a charge of selling one-half pint of whisky and two quarts of beer to one H.L. Griffin, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was on the 2nd day of June, 1917, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 90 days and to pay a fine of $100. From the judgment he appeals. No brief has been filed. The record shows that the testimony of the four witnesses for the state is undisputed. An examination of the record discloses that plaintiff in error had a fair and impartial trial, and that the appeal is without merit. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1920 OK CR 147, 191 P. 1118, 17 Okla. Crim. 734, 1920 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-oklacrimapp-1920.