King v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

King v. State

191 P. 1118, 17 Okla. Crim. 734

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 14, 1920·No. No. A- 3153·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jack King, was convicted on a charge of selling one-half pint of whisky and two quarts of beer to one II. L. Griffin, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was on the 2nd day of June, 1917, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 90 days and to pay a fine of $100. Prom the judgment he appeals. No brief has been filed. The record shows that Che testimony of the four witnesses for the state is und'ispuied. An examination of the record discloses that plaintiff in error had a fair and impartial trial, .and that the appeal is without merit. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, Jack King, was convicted on a charge of selling one-half pint of whisky and two quarts of beer to one II. L. Griffin, and in accordance with the verdict of the jury he was on the 2nd day of June, 1917, sentenced to be confined in the county jail for 90 days and to pay a fine of $100. Prom the judgment he appeals. No brief has been filed. The record shows that Che testimony of the four witnesses for the state is und'ispuied. An examination of the record discloses that plaintiff in error had a fair and impartial trial, .and that the appeal is without merit. The judgment is therefore affirmed.

King v. State, 191 P. 1118, 17 Okla. Crim. 734 (Okla. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

191 P. 1118 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.