King v. State
490 So. 2d 85, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 15, 1986·No. No. BI-54·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for correction of sentence based upon his assertion that the sentence violated the plea agreement is AFFIRMED. The trial court has attached to its order the transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings, which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief. Appellant may not in the future assert this ground in a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
King v. State, 490 So. 2d 85, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).
490 So. 2d 85 (King v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Interest of JLP
490 So. 2d 85 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)