King v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

King v. State

490 So. 2d 85, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 15, 1986

DocketNo. BI-54

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 490 So. 2d 85 (King v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. State, 490 So. 2d 85, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for correction of sentence based upon his assertion that the sentence violated the plea agreement is AFFIRMED. The trial court has attached to its order the transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings, which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief. Appellant may not in the future assert this ground in a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The trial court’s summary denial of appellant’s motion for correction of sentence based upon his assertion that the sentence violated the plea agreement is AFFIRMED. The trial court has attached to its order the transcripts of the plea and sentencing hearings, which conclusively show that appellant is entitled to no relief. Appellant may not in the future assert this ground in a motion for post-conviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850.

THOMPSON, ZEHMER and BAR-FIELD, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

490 So. 2d 85, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 5924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-state-fladistctapp-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack