King v. State

103 So. 925, 20 Ala. App. 684

Opinion

The evidence in this case has been examined and considered by this court en banc. We are of the opinion that the state failed to meet the burden of proof necessary to a conviction of either of the defendants. The probabilities of innocence are entirely too numerous to permit the conviction of these two men to stand. Jeffries v. State, 7 Ala. App. 144, 62 So. 270; McMickens v. State, 16 Ala. App. 78, 75 So. 626; Wade v. State, 17 Ala. App. 371,84 So. 858. The defendants were entitled to the general affirmative charge requested in writing. For the error in refusing these charges, the judgment of conviction is reversed, and the cause is remanded. Under all the evidence here shown, the defendants were entitled to an acquittal. Reversed and remanded.