Wade v. State

84 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 371, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 52
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 10, 1920·No. 4 Div. 610.·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

We have examined the evidence in this case, and are of the opinion that the state failed to meet the burden of proof necessary to a conviction. The probabilities of innocence are entirely too numerous to permit the conviction to stand. Jeffries v. State, 7 Ala. App. 144, 62 South. 270; McMickens v. State, 16 Ala. App. 78, 75 South. 626.

The defendant was entitled to the general affirmative charge. For the error, the judgment is reversed, and the cau'se is' remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wade v. State, 84 So. 858, 17 Ala. App. 371, 1920 Ala. App. LEXIS 52 (Ala. Ct. App. 1920).

84 So. 858 (Wade v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bell v. State
56 So. 2d 683 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1952)
King v. State
103 So. 925 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1925)
Mitchell v. State
93 So. 228 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1922)