King v. Singer Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

King v. Singer Co.

279 S.E.2d 367, 276 S.C. 419, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 402

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedJune 8, 1981

Docket21481

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 279 S.E.2d 367 (King v. Singer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

King v. Singer Co., 279 S.E.2d 367, 276 S.C. 419, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 402 (S.C. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from a circuit court order in an action for workmen’s compensation for alleged disability caused by an occupational disease. The circuit court reversed the Industrial Commission’s determination that the single commissioner had erred by failing to submit the case to a Medical Board pursuant to Section 42-11-120 S. C. Code (1976). Because the determination of the Commission is a matter not affecting the merits of the cause of action, its decision is unreviewable by either the circuit court or this Court for lack of finality. Chastain v. Spartan Mills, 228 S. C. 61, 88 S. E. (2d) 836 (1967); cf. Cord v. E. H. Hines Construction Co., 220 S. C. 356, 67 S. E. (2d) 667 (1951); see also § 14-3-330, S. C. Code (1976). The order of the circuit court is therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

This appeal is from a circuit court order in an action for workmen’s compensation for alleged disability caused by an occupational disease. The circuit court reversed the Industrial Commission’s determination that the single commissioner had erred by failing to submit the case to a Medical Board pursuant to Section 42-11-120 S. C. Code (1976). Because the determination of the Commission is a matter not affecting the merits of the cause of action, its decision is unreviewable by either the circuit court or this Court for lack of finality. Chastain v. Spartan Mills, 228 S. C. 61, 88 S. E. (2d) 836 (1967); cf. Cord v. E. H. Hines Construction Co., 220 S. C. 356, 67 S. E. (2d) 667 (1951); see also § 14-3-330, S. C. Code (1976). The order of the circuit court is therefore reversed and the case remanded to the Industrial Commission for further proceedings.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

279 S.E.2d 367, 276 S.C. 419, 1981 S.C. LEXIS 402, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-singer-co-sc-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack