Hunt v. Whitt
This text of 306 S.E.2d 621 (Hunt v. Whitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a Worker’s Compensation case here on appeal by the employer from an order of the circuit court reversing and remanding the case to the Hearing Commissioner for the purpose of taking additional medical testimony from the claimant. Because the interlocutory order of the circuit court does not involve the merits of the action, it is not reviewable by this Court for lack of finality. King v. The Singer Company, Power Tool Division, 276 S. C. 419, 279 S. E. (2d) 367 (1981). To the extent that the following cases and any others not cited can be construed to authorize appeals under the present circumstances, those cases are overruled. Couch v. Greenville *344 County, 249 S. C. 186, 153 S. E. (2d) 394 (1967); Amick v. City of Columbia, 247 S. C. 254, 146 S. E. (2d) 860 (1966); Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 241 S. C. 116, 127 S. E. (2d) 288 (1962).
The appeal is dismissed without prejudice. See Gunnells v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., 261 S. C. 106, 198 S. E. (2d) 535 (1973).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 S.E.2d 621, 279 S.C. 343, 1983 S.C. LEXIS 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hunt-v-whitt-sc-1983.