King v. Pollard

• Court: District Court, S.D. California
• Decided: May 14, 2021
• Docket: 3:21-cv-00915
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 TRISTIN D. KING, Case No.: 3:21-cv-00915-GPC-AHG CDCR #AW-9524, 11 ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL Plaintiff, 12 ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE vs. FOR FAILING TO PAY 13 FILING FEE REQUIRED

14 BY 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) AND/OR MARCUS POLLARD, Warden; FAILING TO MOVE TO PROCEED 15 M. RUGGIERO, Yard C Captain; IN FORMA PAUPERIS A. TAYLOR, Caseload Counselor II; 16 PURSUANT TO S. ANDERSON, Yard A Captain, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) 17 Defendants. 18 19 Plaintiff Tristin D. King, proceeding pro se and currently incarcerated at Richard J. 20 Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”), has filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 21 U.S.C. § 1983. See ECF No. 1, “Compl.” Plaintiff alleges Defendants violated his 22 Fourteenth Amendment right to due process by involuntarily transferring him from a 23 Level III yard at RJD to a higher security Level IV yard on April 27, 2020, without first 24 providing him notice and an opportunity to be heard. Id. at 13‒14. He seeks $100,000 in 25 punitive damages. Id. at 17. 26 I. Failure to Pay Filing Fee or Request IFP Status 27 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the 28 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of 1 $402. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a). An action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to 2 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 3 Section 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); 4 Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, if the Plaintiff is a 5 prisoner, and even if he is granted leave to commence his suit IFP, he remains obligated 6 to pay the entire filing fee in “increments,” see Williams v. Paramo, 775 F.3d 1182, 1185 7 (9th Cir. 2015), regardless of whether his case is ultimately dismissed. See 28 U.S.C. 8 § 1915(b)(1) & (2); Taylor v. Delatoore, 281 F.3d 844, 847 (9th Cir. 2002). 9 Plaintiff has not prepaid the $402 in filing and administrative fees required to 10 commence this civil action, nor has he submitted a properly supported Motion to Proceed 11 IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). Therefore, his case cannot yet proceed. See 28 12 U.S.C. § 1914(a); Andrews, 493 F.3d at 1051. 13 II. Conclusion and Order 14 Accordingly, the Court: 15 (1) DISMISSES this civil action sua sponte without prejudice for failure to pay 16 the $402 civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a Motion to Proceed IFP pursuant 17 to 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and § 1915(a); and 18 (2) GRANTS Plaintiff forty-five (45) days leave from the date this Order is 19 filed to: (a) prepay the entire $402 civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) 20 complete and file a Motion to Proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his trust 21 account statement for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); S.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 3.2(b). 23 / / / 24 25 26 1 In addition to the $350 statutory fee, civil litigants must pay an additional administrative 27 fee of $52. See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2020)). The additional $52 administrative fee does 28 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall provide Plaintiff 2 || with this Court’s approved form “Motion and Declaration in Support of Motion to 3 || Proceed In Forma Pauperis.” If Plaintiff fails to either prepay the $402 civil filing fee or 4 ||complete and submit the enclosed Motion to Proceed IFP within 45 days, this action will 5 ||remain dismissed without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to satisfy the fee 6 requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) and without further Order of the Court.” 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 ||Dated: May 14, 2021 72 / Od 9 Hon. Gonzalo P. Curiel 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ||? Plaintiff is cautioned that if he chooses to proceed further by either prepaying the full 99 $402 civil filing fee, or submitting a properly supported Motion to Proceed IFP, his Complaint will be screened before service and may be dismissed sua sponte pursuant to 28 23 || U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B), regardless of whether he pays the 54 full $402 filing fee at once, or is granted IFP status and is obligated to pay the full filing fee in installments. See Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1126-27 (9th Cir. 2000) (en banc) 25 (noting that 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e) “not only permits but requires” the court to sua sponte 5 dismiss an in forma pauperis complaint that is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim, 6 or seeks damages from defendants who are immune); see also Rhodes v. Robinson, 621 27 1002, 1004 (9th Cir. 2010) (discussing similar screening required by 28 U.S.C. 28 § 1915A of all complaints filed by prisoners “seeking redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.’’).