Home/New York Court of Appeals/King v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.

King v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.

72 N.Y. 607, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 566
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 12, 1878
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 72 N.Y. 607 (King v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. . New York Central and Hudson River Railroad Co., 72 N.Y. 607, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 566 (N.Y. 1878).

Opinion

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 609

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 610

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 611 FOLGER, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur, except ALLEN, J., taking no part.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kegg v. Truck-Rite Distrib. Sys. Corp.
2024 NY Slip Op 24178 (New York Supreme Court, Kings County, 2024)
People v. Shields
81 A.D.2d 870 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1981)
Coleman v. New York City Transit Authority
332 N.E.2d 850 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Picozzi
275 A.D.2d 670 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)
South Covington & Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. Finan's Admx.
155 S.W. 742 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1913)
Choctaw Electric Co. v. Clark
1911 OK 82 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1911)
People v. Mullen
19 N.Y. Crim. 589 (New York County Courts, 1906)
Roberts v. Port Blakely Mill Co.
70 P. 111 (Washington Supreme Court, 1902)
Grasso v. The Lisnacrieve
87 F. 570 (E.D. New York, 1898)
Livingston v. Spero
18 Misc. 243 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)
Sneda v. Libera
68 N.W. 36 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1896)
McGuire v. Joslyn
10 N.Y.S. 384 (New York Supreme Court, 1890)
Hermann v. State
41 N.W. 171 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1888)
Peschel v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
21 N.W. 269 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1885)
Saulsbury v. Village of Ithaca
31 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 12 (New York Supreme Court, 1881)
Goodwin v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance
73 N.Y. 480 (New York Court of Appeals, 1878)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 N.Y. 607, 1878 N.Y. LEXIS 566, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-new-york-central-and-hudson-river-railroad-co-ny-1878.