King v. Montgomery
50 Cal. 115, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 101
This text of 50 Cal. 115 (King v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
King v. Montgomery, 50 Cal. 115, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 101 (Cal. 1875).
Opinion
The complaint contained no averment that the action against Dobbs and King was commenced, or the writ of attachment sued out and prosecuted, without probable cause. In this the complaint was clearly insufficient, and the plaintiff declining to amend, the motion to dismiss was properly granted.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
White Lighting Co. v. Wolfson
438 P.2d 345 (California Supreme Court, 1968)
McPheeters v. Bateman
53 P.2d 195 (California Court of Appeal, 1936)
Loock v. Pioneer Title Insurance and Trust Co.
40 P.2d 526 (California Court of Appeal, 1935)
Maldonado v. Avalo-Collazo
38 P.R. 471 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1928)
State ex rel. Brown v. Superior Court
87 Wash. 524 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Vesper v. Crane Co.
130 P. 876 (California Supreme Court, 1913)
Cuello v. Fuster
3 P.R. Fed. 193 (D. Puerto Rico, 1907)
James River National Bank v. Purchase
83 N.W. 7 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1900)
Hess v. German Baking Co.
60 P. 1011 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1900)
Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. Thornton
49 P. 573 (California Supreme Court, 1897)
People ex rel. Attorney General v. Brown
23 Colo. 425 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1897)
De Toro v. Robinson
27 P. 671 (California Supreme Court, 1891)
Kelley v. Kriess
9 P. 129 (California Supreme Court, 1885)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
50 Cal. 115, 1875 Cal. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-montgomery-cal-1875.