King v. Marriott International, Inc.

267 F. App'x 301
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 29, 2008
DocketNo. 07-1880
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 267 F. App'x 301 (King v. Marriott International, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Marriott International, Inc., 267 F. App'x 301 (4th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Terry King appeals the district court’s orders adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to grant summary judgment to Marriott International, Inc. on King’s claim of retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621-634 (2000), and on King’s state law contract claims. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible eiTor. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See King v. Marriott Int’l, Inc., No. 9:05-cv-01774-PMD (D.S.C. Mar. 3, 2007), 520 F.Supp.2d 744 (D.S.C.2007), and 520 F.Supp.2d 748 (D.S.C.2007). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McManus-McCoy v. Coker University
D. South Carolina, 2024
Austin v. The Boeing Company
D. South Carolina, 2021
Washington v. The Boeing Company
D. South Carolina, 2021
Bennett v. The Boeing Company
D. South Carolina, 2021

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 F. App'x 301, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-marriott-international-inc-ca4-2008.