King v. Dorgan

183 N.E.2d 126, 344 Mass. 758, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 916
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJune 1, 1962
StatusPublished

This text of 183 N.E.2d 126 (King v. Dorgan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
King v. Dorgan, 183 N.E.2d 126, 344 Mass. 758, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 916 (Mass. 1962).

Opinion

Decree affirmed with costs of this appeal. This is a suit to enforce a restrictive covenant contained in a deed given by the plaintiffs on April 26, 1958, to the defendants’ predecessors in title. From a decree dismissing their bill the plaintiffs appealed. The original restriction read: “The premises are conveyed subject to the restriction that no building or structure shall be erected thereon intended or designed to be used, nor shall said premises be used, for any purpose in connection with the existing Fair Grounds or any future race track in the vicinity either for parking or for concessions of any kind in connection with said Fair Grounds or such race track or for any other purposes so connected.” On August 26, 1958, the plaintiffs executed under seal a document entitled “Release of Restriction” which deleted the words “either for parking or” from the original restriction. During 1960 the defendants permitted patrons of a nearby race track to park their motor vehicles on the land which is subject to the restrictive covenant. For the reasons stated in the judge’s decision, we agree with his conclusion that “the restrictive covenant, as ultimately amended by said document of August 26, 1958, does not prohibit the defendants . . . from using said land for the parking of motor [759]*759vehicles thereon.” See Krinsky v. Leventhal, 323 Mass. 160. Cf. Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Serv. Co. 343 Mass. 547, 552-553.

Frederick M. Myers & Frederick M. Myers, Jr., for the plaintiffs, submitted a brief. George N. Tobia for the defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Quintin Vespa Co. Inc. v. Construction Service Co.
179 N.E.2d 895 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1962)
Krinsky v. Leventhal
80 N.E.2d 477 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 N.E.2d 126, 344 Mass. 758, 1962 Mass. LEXIS 916, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-v-dorgan-mass-1962.