King, Jr. v. Johnson & Johnson
This text of King, Jr. v. Johnson & Johnson (King, Jr. v. Johnson & Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
me NOD DIDI EIR IEEE IEIREE IGE GUS AREA NRE IRD OSI EEO EE
UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO -177)
On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,581 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Wolfson. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7—day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
Inasmuch as no objection is pending a chs time, the FOR THE PANEL: CLERICS Orne Cd. a John W. Nichols LG COUT et ha ers Clerk ofthe Panel of the original on file In my office. UNITED. ae COURT DISTRICT OF WILLIAM T. By :
Waot WIVL INU. 2IOO PUEUIICI euro TNC Loa ANS OMIM
IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738
SCHEDULE CTO-177 — TAG-ALONG ACTIONS
DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION
CALIFORNIA CENTRAL CAC 2 19—08530 Gloria J. Vitto v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19—-08533 Ely E Galbis v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08534 Lizeth M. Flores v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08544 Shante Myers v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08547 Carrie Holmes v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19—-08568 Cynthia Gully v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19—-08582 Breada L. Beals v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08615 Norma Flores v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08617 Terry S. Parsons v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08618 Elizabeth A. Mooney et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08640 Albert Thompkins v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-—08641 Roxanne Williams Martin v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08643 Carmel A. Rambo v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08644 Linda Olin v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08743 Dolores D. Rice v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 2 19-08753 Lucie Pearl Conolly et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 5 19-01892 Phillip S. Fivgas v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 5 19-01894 Patricia Sanders et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 5 19-01895 Linda A. Cato et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 5 19-01902 Genida R. Vezinaw v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 5 19-01903 Mari E. Keen et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 5 19-01906 Sherry L. Moro v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 5 19-01907 Frank R. Pasos v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 5 19-01910 Marion E. Yenalavitch et al v. Johnson and Johnson et CAC 5 19-01921 Kendra J. Coromandel et al v. Johnson and Johnson et al CAC 8 19-01910 Cynthia A. Hoffmann v. Johnson and Johnson et al CALIFORNIA EASTERN CAR 4 10—N1007 Taneae vu Tanhnenn & Tnahnenan et al
A Ae Ee he ee Oe Oe Ne NN OO NEES Ne
CALIFORNIA NORTHERN Maurice Simpson, Individually and as Successor in CAN 3 19-06326 Interest to ANNETTE WILKERSON (Deceased) v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 3 19-06340 King, Jr. v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 3 19—-06341 CEBALLOS et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 3 19-06351 Demas v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 3 19-06354 Griffin et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 3 19-06355 Sabir et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 3 19-06388 Colon v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06315 Robinson v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06328 Martinez v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06342 George et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06353 BILLY NEARS v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06385 Porcher v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06433 Ann Corridon v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19—-06450 Ross v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06519 Victorino v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06520 Brewster v. Johnson & Johnson et al CAN 4 19-06522 Healy et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al CALIFORNIA SOUTHERN CAS 3 19-01935 Arredondo v. Johnson & Jonhson et al
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
King, Jr. v. Johnson & Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/king-jr-v-johnson-johnson-cand-2019.