Home/Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas/Kinch v. State

Kinch v. State

150 S.W. 610, 67 Tex. Crim. 573, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 492
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 23, 1912
DocketNo. 1827.
StatusPublished

This text of 150 S.W. 610 (Kinch v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kinch v. State, 150 S.W. 610, 67 Tex. Crim. 573, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 492 (Tex. 1912).

Opinion

HARPER, Judge.

—In this case the record fails to disclose that the defendant has ever been sentenced by the court trying the case. This being a conviction for a felony, in which the punishment assessed is only ten years confinement in the penitentiary, under article 856 of the Bevised Code of Criminal Procedure an appeal will not lie until sentence has been pronounced and entered of record. Arcia v. State, 26 Texas Crim. App., 193; Heinzman v. State, 34 Texas Crim. Rep., 76; Hinman v. State, 54 Texas Crim. Rep., 434.

The appeal is dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hinman v. State
113 S.W. 280 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1908)
Heinzman v. State
29 S.W. 156 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 S.W. 610, 67 Tex. Crim. 573, 1912 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kinch-v-state-texcrimapp-1912.