Heinzman v. State

29 S.W. 156, 34 Tex. Crim. 76, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 19, 1895
DocketNo. 586.
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 29 S.W. 156 (Heinzman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Heinzman v. State, 29 S.W. 156, 34 Tex. Crim. 76, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8 (Tex. 1895).

Opinions

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This conviction having been obtained for theft of property, an appeal was sought to be prosecuted. Notice of appeal was entered, but sentence, which is the final judgment in this character of felony, was not pronounced; hence, the jurisdiction of this court does not attach to such appeal.

The appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges all present and concurring.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Joseph
356 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Ex Parte Muncy
163 S.W. 29 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Scribner v. State
1913 OK CR 131 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Kinch v. State
150 S.W. 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Wooldridge v. State
135 S.W. 124 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Ex Parte Greenhaw
53 S.W. 1024 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
29 S.W. 156, 34 Tex. Crim. 76, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/heinzman-v-state-texcrimapp-1895.