Heinzman v. State
29 S.W. 156, 34 Tex. Crim. 76, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8
Opinions
This conviction having been obtained for theft of property, an appeal was sought to be prosecuted. Notice of appeal was entered, but sentence, which is the final judgment in this character of felony, was not pronounced; hence, the jurisdiction of this court does not attach to such appeal.
The appeal is dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
Judges all present and concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Heinzman v. State, 29 S.W. 156, 34 Tex. Crim. 76, 1895 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 8 (Tex. 1895).
29 S.W. 156 (Heinzman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Ex Parte Joseph
356 S.W.2d 789 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1962)
Ex Parte Muncy
163 S.W. 29 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1913)
Scribner v. State
1913 OK CR 131 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma, 1913)
Kinch v. State
150 S.W. 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1912)
Wooldridge v. State
135 S.W. 124 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1911)
Ex Parte Greenhaw
53 S.W. 1024 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1899)