Kimetra Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLC

Ninth Circuit

Kimetra Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLC

35 F.4th 1219

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJune 6, 2022

Docket19-15707

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 F.4th 1219 (Kimetra Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimetra Brice v. Haynes Investments, LLC, 35 F.4th 1219 (9th Cir. 2022).

Pincite

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 6 2022 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

KIMETRA BRICE; EARL BROWNE; JILL No. 19-15707 NOVOROT, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-01200-WHO Plaintiffs-Appellees, Northern District of California, San Francisco v. ORDER PLAIN GREEN, LLC,

Defendant,

and

HAYNES INVESTMENTS, LLC; L. STEPHEN HAYNES,

Defendants-Appellants.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 35(a)

and Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judge Koh did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI