Kimberlin v. United States Department of Justice

351 F.3d 1165, 359 U.S. App. D.C. 21, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 21971
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided October 28, 2003·No. 01-5387·Published

Opinion

On Appellants’ Petition for Rehearing

Before: SENTELLE, HENDERSON, and TATEL, * Circuit Judges.

ORDER

PER CURIAM

Upon consideration of the appellants’ petition for panel rehearing, filed on March 28, 2003, and the appellees’ response thereto, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied. Our panel disposition of this case remains unchanged after the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Overton v. Bazzetta, 539 U.S. 126, 123 S.Ct. 2162, 156 L.Ed.2d 162 (2003). To the extent that Overton may affect our determination that we “need not invoke the four factor analysis the United States Supreme Court established in Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89, 107 S.Ct. 2254, 2261-62, 96 L.Ed.2d 64 (1987),” Kimberlin v. United States Dep’t of Justice, 318 F.3d 228, 232 (D.C.Cir. 2003), our alternative disposition, that the prison regulations banning electric and *22 electronic musical instruments satisfy Safley’s test, remains intact, see id. at 233-34.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kimberlin v. United States Department of Justice, 351 F.3d 1165, 359 U.S. App. D.C. 21, 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 21971 (D.C. Cir. 2003).

351 F.3d 1165 (Kimberlin v. United States Department of Justice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Safley
482 U.S. 78 (Supreme Court, 1987)
Overton v. Bazzetta
539 U.S. 126 (Supreme Court, 2003)
Kimberlin v. U.S. Department of Justice
318 F.3d 228 (D.C. Circuit, 2003)