Kimberlin, Brett C. v. Quinlan, Michael J.

D.C. Circuit

Kimberlin, Brett C. v. Quinlan, Michael J.

207 F.3d 667, 340 U.S. App. D.C. 508, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6424, 2000 WL 303166

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 2000

Docket98-5530

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 207 F.3d 667 (Kimberlin, Brett C. v. Quinlan, Michael J.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kimberlin, Brett C. v. Quinlan, Michael J., 207 F.3d 667, 340 U.S. App. D.C. 508, 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 6424, 2000 WL 303166 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Pincite

Opinions

Circuit Judges SENTELLE and GARLAND did not participate in the matter.

A statement of Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc is attached.

PER CURIAM.

ORDER

Appellants’ petition for rehearing en banc and the response thereto have been circulated to the full court. The taking of a vote was requested. Thereafter, a majority of the judges of the court in regular, active service did not vote iñ favor of the petition. Upon consideration of the foregoing, it is

ORDERED that the petition be denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI