Kim v. Francis

2021 NY Slip Op 02072
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 2021
DocketIndex No. 650481/18 Appeal No. 13491-13491A Case No. 2020-02244, 2020-03374
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 02072 (Kim v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kim v. Francis, 2021 NY Slip Op 02072 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

Kim v Francis (2021 NY Slip Op 02072)
Kim v Francis
2021 NY Slip Op 02072
Decided on April 01, 2021
Appellate Division, First Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided and Entered: April 01, 2021
Before: Manzanet-Daniels, J.P., Kern, González, Shulman, JJ.

Index No. 650481/18 Appeal No. 13491-13491A Case No. 2020-02244, 2020-03374

[*1]Paul Kim, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v

Jonathan Francis, et al., Defendants-Respondents, Gerard R. Adams, et al., Defendants. Sunshine Isaacson & Hecht, LLP, Non-Party-Appellant.


Pollack, Pollack, Isaac & DeCicco, LLP, New York (Kenneth Gorman of counsel), for appellants.

Foster Garvey, PC, New York (Kara Steger of counsel), for respondents.



Appeals from orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrea Masley, J.), entered January 17, 2020 and on or about April 14, 2020, which, insofar as appealed from as limited by the briefs, respectively, granted defendants' request for sanctions and directed plaintiff's attorney, Jeffrey A. Sunshine, Esq., to pay the amount of $3,562.50 to defendant Gerard Adams, unanimously dismissed, without costs, for failure to perfect.

Appellants failed to file proof of service of the record and their brief on defendant Adams. Thus, they failed to perfect the appeals (see Rules of App Div, 1st Dept [22 NYCRR] § 1250.9[a][1]). Moreover, appellants offered neither excuse nor explanation, despite the fact that the appearing defendants raised appellants' failure in their respondents' brief. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals on our own motion (see Zetlin v Hanson Holdings , 63 AD2d 878 [1st Dept 1978]; Tonkonogy v Jaffin , 21 AD2d 264, 267 [1st Dept 1964]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: April 1, 2021



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kim v. Francis
2021 NY Slip Op 02072 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 02072, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kim-v-francis-nyappdiv-2021.