Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
SIDENSE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________
2013-1009 ______________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 10-CV-2066, Judge Susan Y. Illston. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
MARK L. HOGGE, SNR Denton US, LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI, RACHEL REPKA, KHALIQ A. IMRAN and ANDREW BLAIR. Of counsel was JAMES A. KLENK.
ROGER L. COOK, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT D. TADLOCK and SARA B. GIARDINA. Of counsel was JOSHUA HAMILTON LEE, of Atlanta, Georgia. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
April 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation (Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.