Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 738 F.3d 1302
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 10, 2013·No. 13-1009·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

KILOPASS TECHNOLOGY, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

SIDENSE CORPORATION, Defendant-Appellee. ____________________

2013-1009 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California in No. 10-CV-2066, Judge Susan Y. Illston. ______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

MARK L. HOGGE, SNR Denton US, LLP, of Washing- ton, DC, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were SHAILENDRA K. MAHESHWARI, RACHEL REPKA, KHALIQ A. IMRAN and ANDREW BLAIR. Of counsel was JAMES A. KLENK.

ROGER L. COOK, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP, of San Francisco, California, argued for defendant- appellee. With him on the brief were ROBERT D. TADLOCK and SARA B. GIARDINA. Of counsel was JOSHUA HAMILTON LEE, of Atlanta, Georgia. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (RADER, Chief Judge, LOURIE, and O'MALLEY, Circuit Judges.).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

April 10, 2013 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation, (Fed. Cir. 2013).

Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation (Kilopass Technology, Inc. v. Sidense Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.