Killian v. Heinzerling

103 N.Y.S. 1130
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Killian v. Heinzerling. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D. 410

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. Order filed. See 99 N. Y. Supp. 1036.

HOUGHTON, J.,

votes to modify the judgment by inserting a provision that the title to the four bonds of the Metropolitan Street [1131]*1131Railway Company was not invedved in the issues of the action, and, as so modified, to affirm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Killian v. Heinzerling, 103 N.Y.S. 1130 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).

103 N.Y.S. 1130 (Killian v. Heinzerling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Killian v. Heinzerling
114 A.D. 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1906)