Killian v. Heinzerling
119 A.D. 867
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Killian v. Heinzerling. Read the opinion of the Court — 114 A.D. 410 →
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Ho opinion. All concurred, except Houghton, J., who voted to modify the judgment by inserting a provision that the title to the four bonds of the Metro.politan Street Railway Company was not involved in the issues of the action, and as so modified, to affirm.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Killian v. Heinzerling, 119 A.D. 867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1907).
119 A.D. 867 (Killian v. Heinzerling) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.