Kilgore Groves, Inc. v. Mayo, Commr. Agriculture
This text of 191 So. 498 (Kilgore Groves, Inc. v. Mayo, Commr. Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
In this cause Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice CHAPMAN and Mr. Justice THOMAS are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the said decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of Stateex rel. Hampton v. McClung,
Affirmed.
TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, BROWN, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, J. J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
191 So. 498, 139 Fla. 874, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilgore-groves-inc-v-mayo-commr-agriculture-fla-1939.