Kilgore Groves, Inc. v. Mayo, Commr. Agriculture

191 So. 498, 139 Fla. 874, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1756
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedAugust 1, 1939
StatusPublished

This text of 191 So. 498 (Kilgore Groves, Inc. v. Mayo, Commr. Agriculture) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kilgore Groves, Inc. v. Mayo, Commr. Agriculture, 191 So. 498, 139 Fla. 874, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1756 (Fla. 1939).

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice CHAPMAN and Mr. Justice THOMAS are of the opinion that the decree of the Circuit Court should be affirmed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice BROWN and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the said decree should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the decree should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the decree should be affirmed; therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of Stateex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the decree of the Circuit Court in this case be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

TERRELL, C. J., and WHITFIELD, BROWN, BUFORD, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Mugler v. Kansas
123 U.S. 623 (Supreme Court, 1887)
Int. Com. Comm. v. Louis. & Nash. RR
227 U.S. 88 (Supreme Court, 1913)
Sligh v. Kirkwood
237 U.S. 52 (Supreme Court, 1915)
Osborne v. Simpson
114 So. 543 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Amos v. Conkling
126 So. 283 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
L. Maxcy, Inc. v. Mayo
139 So. 121 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Kilgore Groves, Inc. v. Mayo
187 So. 256 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1939)
Pompano Horse Club, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Bryan
111 So. 801 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Louis K. Liggett Co. v. Amos
141 So. 153 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)
Pridgen v. Sweat
170 So. 653 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
Hart v. State
103 So. 633 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
State Ex Rel. Pennington v. Quigg
114 So. 859 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
A. R. Douglass, Inc. v. McRainey, as Admrx.
137 So. 157 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
Johnson v. State Ex Rel. Maxcy
128 So. 853 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1930)
Board of County Commissioners v. State Ex Rel. Moore
118 So. 313 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1928)
State Ex Rel. Davis v. Fowler
114 So. 435 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1927)
Ex Parte Lewis
135 So. 147 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1931)
State v. . R. R.
54 S.E. 294 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1906)
State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
191 So. 498, 139 Fla. 874, 1939 Fla. LEXIS 1756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kilgore-groves-inc-v-mayo-commr-agriculture-fla-1939.