Kieffer v. Zucker

248 S.W.3d 640, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 413, 2008 WL 821008
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 25, 2008
DocketED 89854
StatusPublished

This text of 248 S.W.3d 640 (Kieffer v. Zucker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kieffer v. Zucker, 248 S.W.3d 640, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 413, 2008 WL 821008 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carolynne M. Kieffer appeals from the trial court’s judgment in favor of Gary Zucker and Mary Zucker (collectively referred to as Tenants) granting Tenants’ Motion to Enforce Settlement.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties, the legal file, and the record on appeal, and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

ASKEW-KLEIN v. Klein
248 S.W.3d 640 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 S.W.3d 640, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 413, 2008 WL 821008, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kieffer-v-zucker-moctapp-2008.