ASKEW-KLEIN v. Klein

Missouri Court of Appeals

ASKEW-KLEIN v. Klein

248 S.W.3d 640, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 416, 2008 WL 821009

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 25, 2008

DocketED 89650

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 248 S.W.3d 640 (ASKEW-KLEIN v. Klein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ASKEW-KLEIN v. Klein, 248 S.W.3d 640, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 416, 2008 WL 821009 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth D. Klein appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying his maintenance obligation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare *641 or apply the law. Beeler v. Beeler, 820 S.W.2d 657, 661 (Mo.App. W.D.1991). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Kenneth D. Klein appeals from the trial court’s judgment modifying his maintenance obligation. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare *641 or apply the law. Beeler v. Beeler, 820 S.W.2d 657, 661 (Mo.App. W.D.1991). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 S.W.3d 640, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 416, 2008 WL 821009, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/askew-klein-v-klein-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack