Khatskevich v. Victor

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 9, 2026
DocketIndex No. 151658/14|Appeal No. 6830|Case No. 2025-03123|
StatusPublished

This text of Khatskevich v. Victor (Khatskevich v. Victor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Khatskevich v. Victor, (N.Y. Ct. App. 2026).

Opinion

Khatskevich v Victor - 2026 NY Slip Op 03633
skip to main content

It appears you are using Adblock. Please disable Adblock to best experience our website.

Law Reporting
Bureau
Thomas J.K. Smith, State Reporter

Khatskevich v Victor

2026 NY Slip Op 03633

June 9, 2026

Appellate Division, First Department

Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

This decision is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.

Yevgeniya Khatskevich, Plaintiff-Respondent,

v

Adam Victor, et al., Defendants, Manhattan Place Condominium, Defendant-Appellant.

Decided and Entered: June 09, 2026

Index No. 151658/14|Appeal No. 6830|Case No. 2025-03123|

Before: Friedman, J.P., Pitt-Burke, Rosado, Michael, JJ.

Littler Mendelson, P.C., New York (Joseph E. Field of counsel), for appellant.

Law Offices of John T. Brennan, Brooklyn (John T. Brennan of counsel), for respondent.

[*1]

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Shlomo Hagler, J.), entered on or about November 4, 2024, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted plaintiff's motion to reargue the motion of defendant Manhattan Place Condominium (MPC) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, and, upon reargument, vacated so much of its prior order as dismissed the cause of action for sexual harassment under the New York City Human Rights Law (the City HRL) (the fifth cause of action) as against MPC and reinstated that cause of action as against MPC, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, and that cause of action dismissed as against MPC.

Defendant Adam Victor served as the president of MPC's Board of Managers from around 2000 until 2019, and during the relevant period, plaintiff was Victor's administrative assistant. In February 2014, plaintiff commenced this action against Victor, his various companies, and MPC, alleging causes of action for, among other things, sexual harassment, retaliation, and aiding and abetting sexual harassment under the City HRL (see Administrative Code of City of NY § 8-107). In its original order, dated March 4, 2024, Supreme Court dismissed the complaint in its entirety as against MPC, finding with respect to the cause of action for sexual harassment that the record presented no issue of fact as to whether MPC was plaintiff's employer. Upon reargument, the court adhered to its decision that there was no issue of fact as to whether plaintiff was employed by MPC; however, the court found there was an issue of fact as to whether Victor was MPC's agent such that his alleged acts of sexual harassment against plaintiff would be imputed to MPC under the City HRL.

The sexual harassment cause of action should have been dismissed as against MPC regardless of whether Victor was MPC's agent (see e.g. Victor v Khatskevich, 241 AD3d 412, 412 [1st Dept 2025]. As the court found in its original order and reiterated in the order on appeal, the record presented no issues of fact as to whether plaintiff was employed by MPC. Even assuming that Victor was MPC's agent, the agency relationship alone, without a finding that MPC was plaintiff's employer, would not be sufficient to impute liability to MPC for Victor's alleged acts against plaintiff (see Doe v Bloomberg, L.P., 36 NY3d 450, 460 [2021]; see also Nezaj v PS450 Bar and Restaurant, 719 F Supp 3d 318, 329 [SD NY 2024]).

THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.

ENTERED: June 9, 2026

Court Decisions

All Court Decisions Official Reports Service Bound Volumes Decision Search

Resources

RSS Feeds Style Manual Citation Tools Opinion Formatting & Privacy Guidelines Opinion Selection Criteria Legal Research Portal Site Index

About

About the Law Reporting Bureau About our Operations Contact Us Twitter

Quick Contact Info

17 Lodge Street

Albany, NY 12207

Phone: (518) 453-6900

Links to or from other sites do not signify endorsement or relationship with them.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Khatskevich v. Victor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2026

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Khatskevich v. Victor, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/khatskevich-v-victor-nyappdiv-2026.