Khabbaz v. Village of North Syracuse

178 A.D.2d 922, 578 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17725

Opinion

— Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiffs’ submissions in opposition to the motion raised a triable issue of fact whether defendant affirmatively caused or created the dangerous condition in the parking lot owned and maintained by the Village. If so, prior written notice of the defect or condition was not required under Village Law § 6-628 (see, Barrett v City [923] of Buffalo, 96 AD2d 709, 710; Siddon v Fishman Co., 65 AD2d 832, 833, lv denied 46 NY2d 714). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Reagan, J. — Summary Judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Khabbaz v. Village of North Syracuse, 178 A.D.2d 922, 578 N.Y.S.2d 789, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 17725 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

178 A.D.2d 922 (Khabbaz v. Village of North Syracuse) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Siddon v. M. H. Fishman Co.
65 A.D.2d 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
Barrett v. City of Buffalo
96 A.D.2d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1983)