Keyzer v. Amerlink, Ltd.

627 S.E.2d 462
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Keyzer v. Amerlink, Ltd.. Read the opinion of the Court — 360 N.C. 397
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 7, 2006·No. 587A05·Published

Opinion

627 S.E.2d 462 (2006)

Ludovicus N. KEYZER, a/k/a Ludo Keyzer, Joseph Kintz, Robin Kintz, Carl W. Parker III, and Barry Nakell
v.
AMERLINK, LTD., Richard Spoor, Deborah N. Meyer, John Meuser, Meyer & Meuser, P.A., American Detective Services, Inc., and Kenneth J. Johnson.

No. 587A05.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

April 7, 2006.

Barry Nakell, pro se and for remaining plaintiff-appellants.

Anderson, Johnson, Lawrence, Butler & Bock, L.L.P., by Steven C. Lawrence, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellees Amerlink, Ltd. and Richard Spoor.

Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Richard T. Boyette, Raleigh, for defendant-appellees Deborah N. Meyer, John Meuser, and Meyer & Meuser, P.A.

Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemeier, PLLC, by Patrick D. Sarsfield, II, Charlotte, for defendant-appellees American Detective Services, Inc. and Kenneth J. Johnson.

PER CURIAM.

AFFIRMED.

Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Keyzer v. Amerlink, Ltd., 627 S.E.2d 462 (N.C. 2006).

627 S.E.2d 462 (Keyzer v. Amerlink, Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.