Keyzer v. Amerlink, Ltd.
This text of 627 S.E.2d 462 (Keyzer v. Amerlink, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ludovicus N. KEYZER, a/k/a Ludo Keyzer, Joseph Kintz, Robin Kintz, Carl W. Parker III, and Barry Nakell
v.
AMERLINK, LTD., Richard Spoor, Deborah N. Meyer, John Meuser, Meyer & Meuser, P.A., American Detective Services, Inc., and Kenneth J. Johnson.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Barry Nakell, pro se and for remaining plaintiff-appellants.
Anderson, Johnson, Lawrence, Butler & Bock, L.L.P., by Steven C. Lawrence, Fayetteville, for defendant-appellees Amerlink, Ltd. and Richard Spoor.
Cranfill, Sumner & Hartzog, L.L.P., by Richard T. Boyette, Raleigh, for defendant-appellees Deborah N. Meyer, John Meuser, and Meyer & Meuser, P.A.
Nexsen Pruet Adams Kleemeier, PLLC, by Patrick D. Sarsfield, II, Charlotte, for defendant-appellees American Detective Services, Inc. and Kenneth J. Johnson.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
Justice MARTIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
627 S.E.2d 462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/keyzer-v-amerlink-ltd-nc-2006.