Key v. State

549 So. 2d 816, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2387, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5468, 1989 WL 116617
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 6, 1989·No. No. 88-01130·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions and sentences. Appellant cannot raise on direct appeal the voluntariness of his “open” no contest plea. Instead, this issue should first be presented to the trial court in a motion to withdraw that plea. Counts v. State, 376 So.2d 59 (Fla. 2d DCA 1979). As for appellant’s contention that the imposition of consecutive minimum mandatory sentences may violate Palmer v. State, 438 So.2d 1 (Fla.1983), the record presently before us is not sufficient for this court to make that determination. Again, appellant may raise this issue via Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. Daniels v. Smith, 478 So.2d 110 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Affirmed.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and HALL and THREADGILL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Key v. State, 549 So. 2d 816, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2387, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 5468, 1989 WL 116617 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

549 So. 2d 816 (Key v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Soberon v. State
686 So. 2d 20 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)
Cruz v. State
675 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)