Kevin Murphy, Administrator of the Estate of Lawrence Martin Payne v. United States of America, Docket No. 04-6265-Cv

Second Circuit

Kevin Murphy, Administrator of the Estate of Lawrence Martin Payne v. United States of America, Docket No. 04-6265-Cv

427 F.3d 158, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22484

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedOctober 19, 2005

Docket158

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 427 F.3d 158 (Kevin Murphy, Administrator of the Estate of Lawrence Martin Payne v. United States of America, Docket No. 04-6265-Cv) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kevin Murphy, Administrator of the Estate of Lawrence Martin Payne v. United States of America, Docket No. 04-6265-Cv, 427 F.3d 158, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22484 (2d Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal concerns the availability of judicial review of a decision of the United States Air Force denying claims under the Military Claims Act (“MCA”), 10 U.S.C. §§ 2731-2738. The claims were brought by family members of federal employees who were killed in a crash of an Air Force plane in Bosnia in April 1996. See id. § 2733. The Air Force denied the MCA claims on the ground that the Federal Employees Compensation Act (“FECA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 8101-8193, provided the exclusive remedy for the families of federal employees killed in the course of performing government service, see id. § 8116(e). The appeal is from the September 27, 2004, judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Mark R. Kravitz, District Judge), which dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Judge Kravitz ruled that the MCA barred judicial review, see 10 U.S.C. § 2735, except for claims of a violation of constitutional rights or a clear statutory mandate of the MCA, and that the claims in the pending case did not involve either type of claim, however questionable the Air Force’s interpretation of the exclusivity provision of FECA might be.

We affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court. See Murphy v. United States, 340 F.Supp.2d 160 (D.Conn.2004).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal concerns the availability of judicial review of a decision of the United States Air Force denying claims under the Military Claims Act (“MCA”), 10 U.S.C. §§ 2731-2738. The claims were brought by family members of federal employees who were killed in a crash of an Air Force plane in Bosnia in April 1996. See id. § 2733. The Air Force denied the MCA claims on the ground that the Federal Employees Compensation Act (“FECA”), 5 U.S.C. §§ 8101-8193, provided the exclusive remedy for the families of federal employees killed in the course of performing government service, see id. § 8116(e). The appeal is from the September 27, 2004, judgment of the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Mark R. Kravitz, District Judge), which dismissed the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Judge Kravitz ruled that the MCA barred judicial review, see 10 U.S.C. § 2735, except for claims of a violation of constitutional rights or a clear statutory mandate of the MCA, and that the claims in the pending case did not involve either type of claim, however questionable the Air Force’s interpretation of the exclusivity provision of FECA might be.

We affirm on the well-reasoned opinion of the District Court. See Murphy v. United States, 340 F.Supp.2d 160 (D.Conn.2004).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

427 F.3d 158, 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 22484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-murphy-administrator-of-the-estate-of-lawrence-martin-payne-v-ca2-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack