Kevin James v. Melanie James
This text of Kevin James v. Melanie James (Kevin James v. Melanie James) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ November 14, 2016
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A17D0159. KEVIN JAMES v. MELANIE JAMES.
Kevin James filed this application for discretionary appeal from an order denying his motion to recuse the trial judge from post-divorce contempt and modification proceedings.1 We, however, lack jurisdiction. An order denying a motion to recuse is interlocutory. Murphy v. Murphy, 322 Ga. App. 829, 830 (747 SE2d 21) (2013). In order to appeal such an order, an applicant must comply with the interlocutory appeal procedure and obtain a certificate of immediate review. OCGA § 5-6-34 (b). A l t h o u g h K e v i n J a m e s f i l e d a discretionary application, “[t]he discretionary appeal statute does not excuse a party seeking appellate review of an interlocutory order from complying with the additional requirements of OCGA § 5-6-34 (b).” Bailey v. Bailey, 266 Ga. 832, 833 (471 SE2d 213) (1996). Kevin James’s failure to follow the proper appellate procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this application.2 See Warringer v. Warringer, 204 Ga. App. 86, 86 (418 SE2d 446) (1992). Accordingly, his application is hereby DISMISSED.
1 Kevin James originally filed his application in the Georgia Supreme Court, which transferred the matter to this Court. See Case No. S17D0316 (decided October 12, 2016). 2 Orders denying motions to recuse may be reviewed after the entry of final judgment, as part of the appeal from final judgment. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (d); Murphy, supra at 830-832. Here, Kevin James’s application was predicated on the trial court’s order denying his recusal motion, and it appears the case remained pending when he filed his application. See Warringer, supra at 86. Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 11/14/2016 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Kevin James v. Melanie James, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kevin-james-v-melanie-james-gactapp-2016.