Kevin Ferrer, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SharkNinja Operating LLC

District Court, S.D. California·Decided July 1, 2026·No. 3:25-cv-00535·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 KEVIN FERRER, individually and on Case No.: 25-cv-00535-DMS-GC behalf of all others similarly situated, 14 ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff, 15 JOINT MOTION TO AMEND v. SCHEDULING ORDER 16

SHARKNINJA OPERATING LLC, 17 [ECF No. 25] Defendant. 18 19 20 Before the Court is the parties’ Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order. (ECF No. 21 25.) The parties request an approximate 90-day extension of all deadlines in the Scheduling 22 Order. The Court finds the parties have only established good cause for a 60-day extension. 23 Accordingly, the Joint Motion is GRANTED IN PART, and the Scheduling Order (ECF 24 No. 24) is modified as follows: 25 1. Plaintiff’s class certification motion must be filed by October 27, 2026. 26 Counsel for the moving party must review the chambers rules of the assigned District Judge 27 for any specific instructions. 28 /// 1 2. All fact discovery shall be completed by all parties by November 24, 2026. 2 “Completed” means that all discovery under Rules 30-36 of the Federal Rules of Civil 3 Procedure, and discovery subpoenas under Rule 45, must be initiated a sufficient period of 4 time in advance of the cut-off date, so that it may be completed by the cut-off date, taking 5 into account the times for service, notice and response as set forth in the Federal Rules of 6 Civil Procedure. 7 Counsel shall promptly and in good faith meet and confer with regard to all 8 discovery disputes in compliance with Local Rule 26.1(a). The Court expects counsel 9 to make every effort to resolve all disputes without court intervention through the meet and 10 confer process. Discovery disputes must be brought to the Court’s attention in the time 11 and manner required by § IV(A)–(D) of Judge Cabrera’s Chambers Rules. All discovery 12 disputes concerning written discovery must be raised within 30 days of the event 13 giving rise to the dispute, and only after counsel (and any unrepresented parties) have met 14 and conferred to resolve the dispute. See J. Cabrera Chambers R. § IV(A)–(D). A failure 15 to comply in this regard will result in a waiver of a party’s discovery issue. Absent 16 an order of the court, no stipulation continuing or altering this requirement will be 17 recognized by the court. 18 3. The parties shall designate their respective experts in writing by 19 December 22, 2026. The parties must identify any person who may be used at trial to 20 present evidence pursuant to Rules 702, 703 or 705 of the Fed. R. Evid. This requirement 21 is not limited to retained experts. The date for exchange of rebuttal experts shall be by 22 January 5, 2027. The written designations shall include the name, address and telephone 23 number of the expert and a reasonable summary of the testimony the expert is expected to 24 provide. The list shall also include the normal rates the expert charges for deposition and 25 trial testimony. 26 /// 27

28 1 4. By February 2, 2027, each party shall comply with the disclosure provisions 2 in Rule 26(a)(2)(A) and (B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. This disclosure 3 requirement applies to all persons retained or specially employed to provide expert 4 testimony, or whose duties as an employee of the party regularly involve the giving of 5 expert testimony. Except as provided in the paragraph below, any party that fails to 6 make these disclosures shall not, absent substantial justification, be permitted to use 7 evidence or testimony not disclosed at any hearing or at the time of trial. In addition, 8 the Court may impose sanctions as permitted by Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(c). 9 5. Any party shall supplement its disclosure regarding contradictory or rebuttal 10 evidence under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(D) by February 16, 2027. 11 6. All expert discovery shall be completed by all parties by March 9, 2027. The 12 parties shall comply with the same procedures set forth in the paragraph governing fact 13 discovery. 14 7. Failure to comply with this section or any other discovery order of the court 15 may result in the sanctions provided for in Fed. R. Civ. P. 37, including a prohibition on 16 the introduction of experts or other designated matters in evidence. 17 8. All other pretrial motions must be filed by April 6, 2027. Counsel for the 18 moving party must obtain a motion hearing date from the law clerk of the judge who will 19 hear the motion. The period of time between the date you request a motion date and the 20 hearing date may vary from one district judge to another. Please plan accordingly. Failure 21 to make a timely request for a motion date may result in the motion not being heard. 22 Motions in limine are to be filed as directed in the Local Rules, or as otherwise set by the 23 district judge. 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 9. A Mandatory Settlement Conference (“MSC”) will be held by video 2 conference2 on December 14, 2026 at 2:00 PM before Magistrate Judge Guillermo 3 Cabrera. Mandatory directions for participating in the MSC by video conference are 4 attached. The purpose of the MSC is to permit an informal, candid discussion between the 5 attorneys, parties, and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to 6 achieve a mediated resolution of the case. All MSC discussions will be off the record, 7 privileged, and confidential. See CivLR 16.3(h). If the parties believe it would be 8 productive, the parties may request an earlier settlement conference at any time by placing 9 a joint call to chambers or by lodging a joint email to efile_cabrera@casd.uscourts.gov. 10 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16.3, all party representatives and claims adjusters for 11 insured defendants with full and unlimited authority3 to negotiate and enter into a binding 12 settlement, as well as the principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation, must be present 13 and legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case at the MSC. In the case 14 of an entity, an authorized representative of the entity who is not retained outside counsel 15 must be present and must have discretionary authority to commit the entity to pay an 16 amount up to the amount of the Plaintiff’s prayer (excluding punitive damages prayers). 17 The purpose of this requirement is to have representatives present who can settle the case 18 during the course of the conference without consulting a superior. 19 20 21 2 The parties may request that the MSC be converted to an in-person conference informally by placing a joint call to chambers or by lodging a joint email to 22 efile_cabrera@casd.uscourts.gov. Counsel must meet and confer prior to any such request. 23 3 “Full authority to settle” means that the individuals at the settlement conference must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement 24 terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 25 648 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l., Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 26 485–86 (D. Ariz. 2003). The purpose of requiring a person with unlimited settlement 27 authority to attend the conference includes that the person’s view of the case may be altered during the face to face conference. Id. at 486.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kevin Ferrer, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SharkNinja Operating LLC, (S.D. Cal. 2026).

Kevin Ferrer, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SharkNinja Operating LLC (Kevin Ferrer, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. SharkNinja Operating LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pitman v. Brinker International, Inc.
216 F.R.D. 481 (D. Arizona, 2003)