Home/Supreme Court/Kessler v. Treat

Kessler v. Treat

205 U.S. 33, 27 S. Ct. 434, 51 L. Ed. 695, 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1449
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMarch 4, 1907
DocketNos. 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378,
StatusPublished

This text of 205 U.S. 33 (Kessler v. Treat) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kessler v. Treat, 205 U.S. 33, 27 S. Ct. 434, 51 L. Ed. 695, 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1449 (1907).

Opinion

205 U.S. 33 (1907)

KESSLER
v.
TREAT, UNITED STATES MARSHAL.[1]
MORGAN
v.
SAME.
CARPENTER
v.
SAME.
WHITTLE
v.
SAME.
WILCOX
v.
SAME.
BRADEN
v.
SAME.
ROYSTER
v.
SAME.
SMITH
v.
SAME.
BURROUGHS
v.
SAME.
McDOWELL
v.
SAME.

Nos. 370, 371, 372, 373, 374, 375, 376, 377, 378, 379.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued December 3, 4, 1906.
Decided March 4, 1907.
APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA.

*34 MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER:

The same decrees will be entered in each of these cases as in the foregoing.

MR. JUSTICE HARLAN dissented.

MR. JUSTICE MOODY took no part.

NOTES

[1] Argued simultaneously with Tinsley v. Treat, ante, p. 20; for counsel and abstracts of arguments see ante, pp. 21 et seq.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kessler v. Treat
205 U.S. 33 (Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 U.S. 33, 27 S. Ct. 434, 51 L. Ed. 695, 1907 U.S. LEXIS 1449, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kessler-v-treat-scotus-1907.