Kessler v. Hecht

48 S.E. 922, 121 Ga. 274, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 12, 1904
StatusPublished

This text of 48 S.E. 922 (Kessler v. Hecht) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Kessler v. Hecht, 48 S.E. 922, 121 Ga. 274, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 105 (Ga. 1904).

Opinion

Cobb, J.

No error of law is assigned; the motion for a new trial being upon the general grounds only. The evidence, though confiieftng, was amply sufficient to warrant the verdict, and there is nothing to take the case out of the general rule, that under such circumstances the judgment will he affirmed. No sufficient reason appears for suing out this writ of error, and it therefore must have been done for delay only. Nor this reason the mo[275]*275tion that damages he awarded is granted. See Collins v. Mobile Fruit & Trading Co., 108 Ga. 752.

Argued October 20, — Decided November 12, 1904. Complaint. Before Judge Hodges. City court of Macou. February 6, 1904. M. It. Freeman and Claud Estes, for plaintiff in error. Moss & Grace, contra.

Judgment affirmed, with damages.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Collins v. Mobile Fruit & Trading Co.
32 S.E. 667 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
48 S.E. 922, 121 Ga. 274, 1904 Ga. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kessler-v-hecht-ga-1904.