Collins v. Mobile Fruit & Trading Co.
This text of 32 S.E. 667 (Collins v. Mobile Fruit & Trading Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case presents no question of law, and no error is alleged except the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial. The evidence, though conflicting, fully warranted the verdict, and the trial judge was satisfied with the same. In view of the long-established and unvarying rule applicable in such cases, there was no good reason for anticipating a reversal of the judgment below, and consequently the case must have been brought to this court for the purpose of delay only. Accordingly, on motion of counsel for defendant in error, ten per cent, damages are awarded in its favor against the plaintiffs in- error. In future this court will in similar cases award damages for delay, whether asked for or not.
Judgment affirmed, with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 S.E. 667, 108 Ga. 752, 1899 Ga. LEXIS 338, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/collins-v-mobile-fruit-trading-co-ga-1899.