Kesser v. Cambra

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kesser v. Cambra. Read the opinion of the Court — 425 F.3d 1230
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 13, 2005·No. 02-15475·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RICHARD CRAIG KESSER,  Petitioner-Appellant, No. 02-15475 v.  D.C. No. STEVEN J. CAMBRA, JR., Warden, CV-96-03452-PJH Respondent-Appellee. 

JENNIFER GAYLE LEAHY,  No. 01-17467 Petitioner-Appellant, v.  D.C. No. CV-97-01407-PJH TEENA FARMON, Warden, ORDER Respondent-Appellee.  Filed October 14, 2005

Before: Mary M. Schroeder, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three- judge panel opinion in Kesser v. Cambra, No. 02-15475, shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

14343 PRINTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE—U.S. COURTS BY THOMSON/WEST—SAN FRANCISCO

The summary, which does not constitute a part of the opinion of the court, is copyrighted © 2005 Thomson/West.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kesser v. Cambra, (9th Cir. 2005).

Kesser v. Cambra (Kesser v. Cambra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.