Kesser v. Cambra
425 F.3d 1230, 2005 WL 2656746
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided October 14, 2005·No. Nos. 02-15475, 01-17467·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
ORDER
Upon the vote of a majority of nonre-cused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that these cases be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion in Kesser v. Cambra, No. 02-15475, shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kesser v. Cambra, 425 F.3d 1230, 2005 WL 2656746 (9th Cir. 2005).
425 F.3d 1230 (Kesser v. Cambra) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richard Craig Kesser v. Steven J. Cambra, Jr., Warden, Jennifer Gayle Leahy v. Teena Farmon, Warden
425 F.3d 1230 (Ninth Circuit, 2005)