Kervick v. Clayton

Supreme Court

Kervick v. Clayton

403 U.S. 945, 91 S. Ct. 2274

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided June 28, 1971·No. No. 852; No. 858·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeals from Sup. Ct. N. J. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decisions in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Earley v. DiCenso, and Robinson v. DiCenso, ante, p. 602; and Tilton v. Richardson, ante, p. 672.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Reported below: 56 N. J. 523, 267 A. 2d 503.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from Sup. Ct. N. J. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decisions in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Earley v. DiCenso, and Robinson v. DiCenso, ante, p. 602; and Tilton v. Richardson, ante, p. 672.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Reported below: 56 N. J. 523, 267 A. 2d 503.

Kervick v. Clayton, 403 U.S. 945, 91 S. Ct. 2274 (1971).

Pincite

403 U.S. 945 (Kervick v. Clayton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related