Kervick v. Clayton

Supreme Court

Kervick v. Clayton

403 U.S. 945, 91 S. Ct. 2274

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJune 28, 1971

DocketNo. 852; No. 858

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 403 U.S. 945 (Kervick v. Clayton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Kervick v. Clayton, 403 U.S. 945, 91 S. Ct. 2274 (1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeals from Sup. Ct. N. J. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decisions in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Earley v. DiCenso, and Robinson v. DiCenso, ante, p. 602; and Tilton v. Richardson, ante, p. 672.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Reported below: 56 N. J. 523, 267 A. 2d 503.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeals from Sup. Ct. N. J. Judgment vacated and cases remanded for reconsideration in light of this Court’s decisions in Lemon v. Kurtzman, Earley v. DiCenso, and Robinson v. DiCenso, ante, p. 602; and Tilton v. Richardson, ante, p. 672.

Mr. Justice Black is of the opinion that the judgment should be reversed. Mr. Justice Brennan took no part in the consideration or decision of these cases.

Reported below: 56 N. J. 523, 267 A. 2d 503.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

403 U.S. 945, 91 S. Ct. 2274, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/kervick-v-clayton-scotus-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack