Kertesz v. Feldheim
105 N.J.L. 239
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Kertesz v. Feldheim. Read the opinion of the Court — 6 N.J. Misc. 10 →
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance- — The Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Mintukn, Black, Campbell, White, Yak Buskiek, McGlennoh, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 11.
For dismissal — Paekee, J. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Kertesz v. Feldheim, 105 N.J.L. 239 (N.J. 1928).
105 N.J.L. 239 (Kertesz v. Feldheim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.